Skip to content

The Twelve: Disciples and Apostles

Scripture names the Twelve four separate times, and no two lists put them in the same order. That looks at first like the ordinary untidiness of four men remembering the same group of friends. It isn't. Lay the four lists side by side and count positions, and a structure appears that none of the four authors mentions and all four obey.

In one sentence: Jesus appointed twelve men to announce the restoration of Israel's twelve tribes, called them to be with Him before He sent them out, and made their witness to His resurrection the foundation of His Church. So what qualifies you for His work is that He chose you and you are with Him.

Key Takeaways

(This section follows the Key Takeaways format — see that page for what each part is for.)

Types and prophecy

Twelve is a prophecy about Israel. Israel had twelve tribes. When Jesus appoints twelve men, He is making a claim in the shape of a number, and He says so outright: the Twelve will "sit on twelve thrones, judging the twelve tribes of Israel" (Matthew 19:28). John's vision closes the loop. The city has twelve gates bearing the names of the tribes and twelve foundations bearing the names of the apostles (Revelation 21:12-14). Both are named. Neither is dissolved into the other.

Lessons about Jesus

  • He chose before He sent. Mark gives the purpose clause in two halves, and the order is not reversible: "so that they might be with him and he might send them out to preach" (Mark 3:14). Being with Him is the first half of the appointment.
  • He prayed all night over the choice (Luke 6:12), and one of the twelve He chose betrayed Him. Both facts stand in the same passage.
  • He renames people. Simon becomes Peter, James and John become Sons of Thunder. Renaming is what God does to Abram and Jacob; Jesus does it on His own authority, at first meeting (John 1:42).
  • He chose men who could not have chosen each other. A tax collector working for Rome and a Zealot sworn against it are two to four names apart in every list.

Memory verses

✝️ Mark 3:14 (ESV)

14 And he appointed twelve (whom he also named apostles) so that they might be with him and he might send them out to preach

✝️ John 15:16 (ESV)

16 You did not choose me, but I chose you and appointed you that you should go and bear fruit and that your fruit should abide, so that whatever you ask the Father in my name, he may give it to you.

Be transformed

Reading their lists should dismantle three assumptions.

  • That God recruits for competence. Nothing in any of the four lists is a résumé. Six of the twelve get nothing but a name.
  • That the people you cannot work alongside disqualify the room. Matthew and Simon the Zealot had every political reason to despise each other, and were given three years in the same small group. If your fellowship has been narrowed to people who already agree with you, it is narrower than the one Jesus assembled.
  • That obscurity means failure. Three of the Twelve never speak a recorded word on their own, four if Bartholomew is not Nathanael. They are named on the foundations of the city anyway (Revelation 21:14).

Prayer

Father, you chose twelve ordinary men and made them the foundation of the city that has no need of sun or moon. You did not choose them for their strength, and you did not lose them for their weakness. Teach us to want your presence before we want your commission: to be with your Son Jesus first, and sent second. And where we have narrowed the company you have given us, widen it again. In Jesus' name. Amen.

Study outline

Four lists

The Twelve are enumerated at four points in the New Testament, and each list sits at a different hinge in the story.

Passage Where it sits What it is doing
Mark 3:16-19 The appointment on the mountain The founding moment itself
Luke 6:14-16 After a whole night of prayer (6:12) The moment the name apostles is given
Matthew 10:2-4 Immediately before the sending discourse (10:5) A commissioning roster
Acts 1:13 The upper room, before Pentecost The surviving eleven, waiting

Mark's is the constitutional act. Luke's is the naming. Matthew's is the deployment order. Acts' is a roll call taken after one name has been struck off it.

Who wrote these, and for whom. Mark is the earliest of the three Gospels here, traditionally associated with Peter's preaching in Rome and written for a largely Gentile audience, which is why he stops to translate Semitic terms like Boanerges (3:17). Matthew writes for readers who know the Hebrew Scriptures, and arranges his material into five great discourses, of which the sending of the Twelve (chapter 10) is the second. Luke and Acts are two halves of one work addressed to Theophilus, written with the stated aim of an orderly account (Luke 1:3). That is why Luke alone dates the naming of the apostles and alone tells us about the night of prayer that preceded it. Each list therefore serves its own author's purpose before it serves our desire to harmonise them, and the table below is a comparison no evangelist set out to make.

The skeleton inside the lists

Compare the four lists by position, and the untidiness resolves into something highly ordered. There are three groups of four. The membership of each group never changes. The order within a group changes constantly.

Position Matthew 10:2-4 Mark 3:16-19 Luke 6:14-16 Acts 1:13
1 Simon Peter Simon Peter Simon Peter Peter
2 Andrew James Andrew John
3 James John James James
4 John Andrew John Andrew
5 Philip Philip Philip Philip
6 Bartholomew Bartholomew Bartholomew Thomas
7 Thomas Matthew Matthew Bartholomew
8 Matthew Thomas Thomas Matthew
9 James son of Alphaeus James son of Alphaeus James son of Alphaeus James son of Alphaeus
10 Thaddaeus Thaddaeus Simon the Zealot Simon the Zealot
11 Simon the Zealot Simon the Zealot Judas son of James Judas son of James
12 Judas Iscariot Judas Iscariot Judas Iscariot (absent)

Three things hold across all four lists without exception:

  1. Peter is first every time. Matthew goes further and numbers him, πρῶτος (prōtos, PRO-toss, G4413), "first," though no one else in his list is given a number. It is an ordinal marker with nothing after it to be ordinal against.
  2. Philip is fifth every time, and James son of Alphaeus is ninth every time. Each heads a group of four.
  3. Judas Iscariot is last every time he appears at all, and he is simply gone in Acts.

Membership never crosses a group boundary. Andrew moves between positions 2 and 4, never to 5. Thomas and Matthew swap places freely, never out of the second four.

Scripture never explains this. But four lists agreeing on group membership and group leaders while disagreeing on internal order look like a remembered organisational structure: three sub-groups, each with a fixed head.

One dependency. Group three's membership is only constant if Thaddaeus (Matthew, Mark) and Judas son of James (Luke, Acts) are the same man. If they were two different people, the pattern in that group breaks. The identification is the straightforward reading and is discussed below, but the structural claim rests on it.

An independent trace of three groups. The early church also remembered the apostles in threes, though along different lines. Summarising the oldest form of the mission traditions, Richard Lipsius found the Twelve divided into three groups: Peter and Andrew, Matthew and Bartholomew around the Black Sea; Thomas, Thaddaeus and Simon the Cananaean in Parthia; John and Philip in Asia Minor (reported in A. C. McGiffert's notes to Eusebius, Church History 3.1). The groupings do not match the list order (Matthew and Bartholomew travel with the first pair, though both belong to the second four), so this does not confirm the pattern above. It is a separate witness that the Twelve were remembered as organised in threes at all, which suggests the list structure reflects something real.

Matthew's list is six pairs, and English hides it

Matthew builds his list differently from Mark, and the difference is in the Greek grammar. Matthew joins names with καί (kai, G2532, "and") inside each pair, then drops the conjunction entirely between pairs:

Simon who is called Peter and Andrew his brother, James the son of Zebedee and John his brother, Philip and Bartholomew, Thomas and Matthew the tax collector, James the son of Alphaeus and Thaddaeus, Simon the Cananaean and Judas Iscariot.

Six pairs. Mark, by contrast, strings every name on the same conjunction (καί, καί, καί), a flat chain with no internal grouping.

Matthew places this paired list immediately before the sending discourse. And Mark, describing the sending, writes:

✝️ Mark 6:7 (ESV)

7 And he called the twelve and began to send them out two by two, and gave them authority over the unclean spirits.

The Greek is δύο δύο (duo duo), literally "two two": a Semitic way of saying "in twos," the same doubling Hebrew uses for distribution.

Scripture never names which two travelled together. What it does show is narrower: Matthew, alone among the four, arranges the Twelve in pairs at the point where they are about to be sent out in pairs.

An early reader saw the same thing. The apocryphal Acts of Thomas, a third-century romance, opens by listing the apostles as they divide up the world, and it lists them in pairs:

Simon called Peter, and Andrew his brother; James the son of Zebedee, and John his brother; Philip and Bartholomew; Thomas, and Matthew the tax-gatherer; James of Alphæus and Simon the Cananæan; and Judas of James.

— Acts of the Holy Apostle Thomas 1 (Ante-Nicene Fathers, Vol. 8)

The first four pairs are Matthew's, in Matthew's order, down to "Matthew the tax-gatherer" (the self-designation only Matthew's Gospel uses). The last four are re-paired because Judas Iscariot is gone and Thaddaeus appears under his other name. So this is not independent testimony: it is a text depending on Matthew. That dependence is what makes it useful. It shows a reader in antiquity, working from Matthew's Greek, taking the list to be paired, so the pairing is in the Greek and predates modern punctuation.

From disciple to apostle

The two words are not synonyms, and Luke marks the exact moment one becomes the other.

μαθητής (mathētēs, math-ay-TACE, G3101), from μανθάνω, "to learn." A learner, a pupil. It is a wide word. Anyone following Jesus is a mathētēs, and there were many.

ἀπόστολος (apostolos, ah-POS-toh-los, G652), from ἀποστέλλω, "to send off." A delegate, an envoy, one dispatched with the authority of the sender. The word is about commission.

✝️ Luke 6:12-13 (ESV)

12 In these days he went out to the mountain to pray, and all night he continued in prayer to God. 13 And when day came, he called his disciples and chose from them twelve, whom he named apostles:

The sequence in verse 13 is precise: He called the disciples (the wide group), chose twelve from among them, and named them apostles. The Greek verb is ὠνόμασεν (ōnomasen, G3687), "he named." The title is conferred.

A textual note strengthens the point: Mark 3:14 also contains the clause "whom he also named apostles," but some manuscripts omit it; both the CSB and the NLT flag the variant in their notes, and the ESV brackets it in parentheses. If the shorter reading of Mark is original, then Luke 6:13 is our sole witness to the moment the name was given, and Luke's careful dating of it matters all the more. Either way the naming is Luke's contribution to the account.

Matthew uses the word apostolos exactly once in his Gospel, at 10:2, heading this list. Everywhere else his term is disciples. The word arrives when the sending does.

The calling came in three stages

Asking "in what order were they called?" assumes a single event. There were at least three, and running them together flattens the story.

Stage one: first encounter (John 1:35-51). In Judea, near where John was baptising, two of John's disciples follow Jesus. One is Andrew; he fetches his brother Simon. Jesus renames Simon on the spot, before he has done anything:

✝️ John 1:42 (ESV)

42 He brought him to Jesus. Jesus looked at him and said, "You are Simon the son of John. You shall be called Cephas" (which means Peter ).

The next day Jesus finds Philip, and Philip finds Nathanael. Nobody has left an occupation yet.

Stage two: the call to follow (Matthew 4:18-22; Luke 5:1-11). Later, in Galilee, the fishermen leave the nets. This is where "follow me" becomes a change of life.

Stage three: the appointment (Mark 3:13-19; Luke 6:12-16). Later still, out of a large body of disciples, twelve are formally constituted and named apostles.

So men who had already been following for months were appointed only at stage three. The order matters pastorally: nobody in this story was commissioned on first meeting.

Why the number had to be twelve

Israel had twelve tribes. Jesus does not leave the connection to inference:

✝️ Matthew 19:28 (ESV)

28 Jesus said to them, "Truly, I say to you, in the new world, when the Son of Man will sit on his glorious throne, you who have followed me will also sit on twelve thrones, judging the twelve tribes of Israel.

"In the new world" translates παλιγγενεσία (palingenesia, pal-ing-gen-es-EE-ah, G3824), from palin, "again," and genesis, "origin": a rebirth or renewal. The word occurs only twice in the New Testament, here and at Titus 3:5, where it describes the individual believer's regeneration. Here it is cosmic in scale: the renewal of the world itself, with the Son of Man enthroned and twelve thrones beside His.

This was legible to Jesus's contemporaries. The expectation that God would restore the twelve tribes was widespread, and the community at Qumran, a renewal movement within Israel, organised itself under a council of twelve for what appears to be this reason (Community Rule, 1QS 8:1-2; see the NIV Cultural Backgrounds Study Bible on Mark 3:14). Appointing twelve men was a recognisable public claim: this is the restoration of Israel, and it is beginning here.

Read dispensationally, this is the point at which the number refuses to be flattened. The Twelve do not replace the twelve tribes. They are promised thrones from which to judge them, which requires the tribes to still be there to be judged. John's final vision keeps both sets of names permanently visible:

✝️ Revelation 21:12-14 (ESV)

12 It had a great, high wall, with twelve gates, and at the gates twelve angels, and on the gates the names of the twelve tribes of the sons of Israel were inscribed— 13 on the east three gates, on the north three gates, on the south three gates, and on the west three gates. 14 And the wall of the city had twelve foundations, and on them were the twelve names of the twelve apostles of the Lamb.

Twelve gates for Israel. Twelve foundations for the apostles. One city, two sets of names, neither erased. Paul says the same thing structurally when he calls the Church "built on the foundation of the apostles and prophets, Christ Jesus himself being the cornerstone" (Ephesians 2:20, ESV).

The men themselves

Three of the Twelve (Matthew, James son of Alphaeus and Simon the Zealot) never speak a recorded word on their own in Scripture, and Bartholomew joins them unless he is Nathanael. What follows is what the text supplies; where a meaning is uncertain, it is marked so.

# Name Original Meaning Background
1 Simon Peter Σίμων Πέτρος Simon from Hebrew שִׁמְעוֹן (Shimʿon, H8095), "he has heard"; Peter / Aramaic Cephas, "rock" Fisherman, Bethsaida and Capernaum
2 Andrew Ἀνδρέας A Greek name, from ἀνήρ anēr, "man" — "manly" Fisherman; Peter's brother; first a disciple of John the Baptist
3 James son of Zebedee Ἰάκωβος Jacob, יַעֲקֹב (Yaʿaqob, H3290), "heel-grabber, supplanter" Fisherman; first apostle martyred (Acts 12:2)
4 John Ἰωάννης יוֹחָנָן (Yochanan, H3110), "Yahweh has been gracious" Fisherman; James's brother; both named Sons of Thunder
5 Philip Φίλιππος A Greek name — philos + hippos, "lover of horses" Bethsaida, same town as Andrew and Peter
6 Bartholomew Βαρθολομαῖος Aramaic bar-Talmai, "son of Talmai" — a patronymic, not a personal name Traditionally identified with Nathanael of Cana (see below)
7 Thomas Θωμᾶς Aramaic תְּאוֹמָא (teʾoma), "twin"; Greek Didymus means the same (John 11:16) Unrecorded; whose twin is never said
8 Matthew Μαθθαῖος מַתִּתְיָה (Mattityah, H4993), "gift of Yahweh"; also called Levi, "attached" Tax collector (τελώνης, telōnēs) under Rome
9 James son of Alphaeus Ἰάκωβος As above; Alphaeus is of uncertain derivation Nothing recorded beyond the lists
10 Thaddaeus / Judas son of James Θαδδαῖος Uncertain. Strong's declines to derive it Speaks once (John 14:22)
11 Simon the Zealot Καναναῖος / Ζηλωτής Aramaic קַנְאָן (qanʾan), "zealous" — not "Canaanite" Zealot, or of zealot temperament
12 Judas Iscariot Ἰούδας Ἰσκαριώτης Judah, "praised"; Iscariot probably ish-Qeriyoth, "man of Kerioth" Kept the money box (John 12:6); betrayed Jesus

Three notes on that table, each a place where confident-sounding tradition outruns the text.

Simon the Cananaean is not a Canaanite. Matthew and Mark call him Καναναῖος (Kananaios, G2581), which the KJV rendered "Simon the Canaanite", and Strong's itself flags that as an error, noting the word was mistaken for a derivative of Χαναάν, "Canaan." It is Aramaic qanʾan, "zealous one." Luke simply translates it into Greek for his readers: Ζηλωτής, Zēlōtēs, "Zealot" (Luke 6:15).

The ESV renders Kananaios as "Zealot" at both Matthew 10:4 and Mark 3:18, silently doing for the modern reader what Luke did for his, so an ESV reader sees one consistent man across all four lists and never encounters the problem. A KJV reader meets "Simon the Canaanite" in Matthew and Mark and "Simon Zelotes" in Luke, and has no way to tell from the English that these are the same word. If you are teaching from the KJV, correct it out loud.

Bartholomew is probably Nathanael, but Scripture never says so. The argument runs: Bar-Talmai is a patronymic ("son of Talmai"), so the man needs a personal name; Bartholomew appears in all four lists and Nathanael in none; John never mentions Bartholomew and the Synoptics never mention Nathanael; Philip brings Nathanael to Jesus (John 1:45) and Philip stands immediately before Bartholomew in three of the four lists; and John 21:2 places Nathanael among named apostles at a resurrection appearance. That is a strong cumulative case. It remains an inference.

Thaddaeus and Judas son of James. Matthew and Mark have Thaddaeus at position 10; Luke and Acts have Judas son of James in the same group. The straightforward reading is one man with two names, unremarkable in a period when many Jews carried both a Semitic and a Greek or Latin name, and the second name would have been useful because Judas had become unusable.

A tax collector and a Zealot

Matthew collected taxes for the Roman occupation; a τελώνης was regarded as a collaborator and a thief, which is why the phrase "tax collectors and sinners" needs no explanation in the Gospels. Simon was called the Zealot, which may mark membership of the movement of armed Jewish nationalism (attested as an organised party only from the revolt of AD 66) or a zealous temperament. That movement's programme was throwing Rome out, and its extreme wing later took to assassinating collaborators.

Under any normal circumstance these two men are enemies. Jesus put them in the same group of twelve and kept them there for three years.

In Mark and Luke, Matthew is listed before Thomas. In Matthew's list, he places himself after Thomas, and he is the only one of the four writers to attach "the tax collector" to his own name.

Sent to Israel first

The commission that follows Matthew's list is explicitly restricted:

✝️ Matthew 10:5-6 (ESV)

5 These twelve Jesus sent out, instructing them, "Go nowhere among the Gentiles and enter no town of the Samaritans, 6 but go rather to the lost sheep of the house of Israel.

This is a real limitation with a date on it: the same Gospel ends with "make disciples of all nations" (Matthew 28:19). But the order of operations is deliberate and fits the number twelve: the restoration of Israel is offered to Israel first, by twelve men who are themselves the sign of that restoration.

When Greeks later come looking for Jesus, they approach Philip, who fetches Andrew (John 12:20-22), the only two of the Twelve carrying purely Greek names, both from Bethsaida in Galilee. Nothing in the text says this is why they were approached.

They all fled

✝️ Mark 14:50 (ESV)

50 And they all left him and fled.

They argued at the Last Supper about which of them was the greatest (Luke 22:24). They failed to understand teaching they had heard repeatedly. Peter denied Him three times. One of them sold Him.

Their qualification was that Jesus chose them and they were with Him: "You did not choose me, but I chose you" (John 15:16, ESV).

The twelfth chair

After the ascension, the eleven's first recorded act is arithmetic. They set about becoming twelve again, which only makes sense if the number carries the weight argued above.

Peter states the qualification:

✝️ Acts 1:21-22 (ESV)

21 So one of the men who have accompanied us during all the time that the Lord Jesus went in and out among us, 22 beginning from the baptism of John until the day when he was taken up from us—one of these men must become with us a witness to his resurrection."

Two requirements: presence for the whole public ministry, from John's baptism to the ascension, and eyewitness of the resurrection. Both are conditions no later generation can satisfy. Whatever else is said about apostleship, the office as defined here closes with the people who met those terms. Matthias was chosen by lot (Acts 1:26), before Pentecost; it is the last recorded use of the lot in Scripture.

Theological principle

The Twelve are a claim before they are a team. By appointing twelve men and promising them twelve thrones over twelve tribes, Jesus announced the restoration of Israel and staffed it with people who had nothing to recommend them but His choosing. Their calling ran presence-before-mission: with him, then sent out. Their commission was grounded in their having been chosen and having seen the risen Lord; their competence repeatedly failed.

This does not rest on the list structure or on any single word study. It is stated outright in Mark 3:14, Matthew 19:28, John 15:16 and Acts 1:21-22.

Questions for discussion

  1. The language. Luke 6:13 says Jesus "called his disciples and chose from them twelve, whom he named apostles." A μαθητής (mathētēs, G3101) is a learner; an ἀπόστολος (apostolos, G652) is an envoy sent with the sender's authority. What does the second title give the Twelve that the first did not?
  2. The text in its context. Jesus told the Twelve they "will also sit on twelve thrones, judging the twelve tribes of Israel" (Matthew 19:28). What would a Jew waiting for God to restore the tribes have heard when Jesus appointed exactly twelve men (Mark 3:14)?
  3. Christ. Jesus prayed all night and still chose Judas (Luke 6:12-16). What does that do to the assumption that a well-prayed decision is one that cannot go wrong?
  4. The hard part. Jesus sent the Twelve out with "Go nowhere among the Gentiles and enter no town of the Samaritans" (Matthew 10:5), and the same Gospel ends with "make disciples of all nations" (Matthew 28:19). What happened between Matthew 10 and Matthew 28 to turn the first command into the second?
  5. The company. Matthew calls himself "Matthew the tax collector" (Matthew 10:3), and Luke names "Simon who was called the Zealot" in the same list (Luke 6:15), two men with every political reason to despise each other. Who is missing from your fellowship because of a difference Jesus would have kept in the room?
  6. Be transformed. Mark 3:14 says Jesus appointed twelve "so that they might be with him and he might send them out to preach." What changes in how you weigh your own service, or anyone else's, when the first half of the appointment is being with Him?

Biblical text. Scripture quotations marked ESV are from the English Standard Version (Crossway). Greek text is the SBL Greek New Testament (CC BY 4.0); English renderings marked WEB are the World English Bible (public domain). Both are available in this project's bible-text.db.

Original-language tools.

  • Strong's Greek and Hebrew Dictionaries (public domain), consulted for G652 apostolos, G3101 mathētēs, G3824 palingenesia, G2581 Kananaios, G5057 telōnēs, and the name entries. Strong's own note at G2581 flags the KJV's "Canaanite" as a mistake — the correction in this study is Strong's, not an innovation.
  • The MACULA Greek linguistic dataset (CC BY 4.0) was used to confirm by concordance that apostolos occurs exactly once in Matthew (10:2) and that palingenesia occurs only at Matthew 19:28 and Titus 3:5.

Commentaries consulted. These were read after the exegesis above, as a check on it.

  • ESV Study Bible (Crossway, 2016) — confirmed that Peter heads all four lists and that apostolos appears only at Matthew 10:2 in that Gospel; supplied the observation that Mark 3:14-15 gives the Twelve a twofold task, being and sending. Its note on Matthew 19:28 identifies palingenesia as the future renewal of the world rather than individual regeneration.
  • NIV Cultural Backgrounds Study Bible and NKJV Cultural Backgrounds Study Bible (Zondervan, ed. John H. Walton and Craig S. Keener) — contributed the Qumran parallel: a renewal movement within Israel could signal itself by appointing twelve leaders, as the Community Rule (1QS 8:1-2) attests. This is the single most useful thing the commentaries added that the biblical text alone does not supply.
  • NIV Biblical Theology Study Bible (Zondervan) — on the apostolic qualification in Acts 1:21-22 and on Luke's narrower and broader uses of "apostle" (Acts 14:4, 14).
  • NLT Life Application Study Bible, 3rd ed. (Tyndale House, 2019) — on the Twelve's shared characteristic being willingness rather than ability.

Method. The exegesis-before-application order followed here is that of Gordon D. Fee and Douglas Stuart, How to Read the Bible for All Its Worth, 4th ed. (Zondervan).

A note on what is not here. Traditions about how each apostle died come from sources of widely varying reliability, most of them centuries later than the events. They are treated in the individual profiles, labelled as tradition, and are deliberately absent from the argument above.